Tobacco Advertising Is Illegal but Alcohol Is Not Free Essays

string(100) , for example, cirrhosis of the liver represented more than 1400 passings in 2003 (Statistics Canada, 2009). COMM 3P14 †Media Industries Tobacco Advertising is Illegal, however Advertising for Alcohol isn't, Is This Hypocritical? Rebecca Stewart 4574927 Russell Johnston Seminar 3 November 11, 2012 Advertisements are a fundamental piece of any company’s promoting procedure, and are utilized to advise or convince a crowd of people about a specific item or administration. Truth be told, North American organizations are among the world’s most elevated sponsors (Boone et al. , 2010, 502). We will compose a custom article test on Tobacco Advertising Is Illegal however Alcohol Is Not or on the other hand any comparable point just for you Request Now Today, a normal purchaser is presented to several commercials consistently. It is the point at which these organizations endeavor to advance a perilous item that limitations must be, and have been set up. For quite a long while, Canada’s guidelines on tobacco commercials have gotten stricter, while liquor promotions are still allowed over various mediums. This leads one to scrutinize the distinction between the two substances, and if this idea is in actuality dishonest. The partners recognized in this paper are the watchers and audience members of the commercials, explicitly the young crowd. The standards associated with liquor advancement are inspected with a focal point that consolidates the perspectives on Horkheimer and Adorno’s viewpoint on promoting. Alongside a short history of tobacco promoting guidelines, this paper will talk about the moral issues associated with liquor publicizing, and proof to help that alcoholic items are still a peril than tobacco, and ought to have a similar publicizing limitations. There is likewise proof to recommend that most of Canadians are supportive of more tight limitations on liquor promoting. The current tricky condition of permitting liquor to be publicized, however evacuating all tobacco related showcasing is additionally talked about in detail. Writing Review Not just is publicizing illicit for tobacco organizations, retailers are currently committed to hide these items. Cigarette organizations are likewise no longer allowed to mark their item as light or gentle on the bundle (Pollay, 2004, 80). The main Canadian enactment effectively went for publicizing guidelines was the Tobacco Act of 1997 (Pollay, 2004, 80). Wellbeing Canada made arrangements in this demonstration, for example, tobacco items must not be advanced, and all makers must share data about the product’s emanations and wellbeing dangers emerging from utilization of the item on the bundling (Health Canada, 2011). The plan of this demonstration was to shield youngsters and others from being urged to attempt tobacco related items without being educated regarding the risks to their wellbeing (Polley, 2004, 81). The conviction was that tobacco advertisements were focused on new smokers, and that organizations were attempting to draw in youngsters towards their image. This thought is conceivable on the grounds that so as to keep up a solid business over a significant stretch of time, new clients must be focused on. Further, there is proof supporting the way that current smokers are not prone to be changed over to another brand, making youth focused on notices almost certain (Polley, 2004, 83). There was strain to reinforce the promoting limitations after incalculable wellbeing dangers and passings were ascribed to smoking. â€Å"Smoking has been evaluated to bring about approximately 45,000 passings every year and is a significant reason for respiratory illness, malignant growth and circulatory disease† (Sen, 2009, 189). An examination directed by the American Journal of Public Health took a gander at 481 haphazardly chose tobacco retailers after the item show boycott to comprehend the progressions that brought about tobacco advancement (Cohen et al. , 2011, 1879). Their examination uncovered that this boycott effectively constrained the introduction of tobacco items, and exhibited the significance of a total prohibition on retail tobacco shows (Cohen et al. , 2011, 1880). Plainly, restricting publicizing presentation to dangerous items, for example, cigarettes really confines shopper introduction, and consequently advances the possibility of a solid open. Since these promotion guidelines have end up being a triumph, it would probably have a fundamentally the same as impact when applied to liquor. Morals is a fundamental thought in the realm of promoting. Advertisers should settle on mindful choices, and not simply center around producing benefits, since it is lawful. â€Å"Ads should address crowds not similarly as purchasers who care about material interests yet as residents who care about social temperances and the open good† (Hove, 2009, 35). Advertising mixed drinks is unscrupulous. While there are gentle limitations in Canada with respect to liquor advancements, there is an interest for additional. A few territories run advertisements that advance mindful drinking, or the perils of driving under the influence trying to reveal insight into liquor misuse (Boone, 2010, 525). Nonetheless, these endeavors don't counterbalance the large number of lager and alcohol ads in today’s media. Some liquor commercials incorporate the belief system that drinking a specific brand of lager will impact their social class, or improve their personal satisfaction somehow or another. This is incredibly disputable. An article from the South African Journal of Psychology notes, â€Å"there are no laws against [alcohol] notices; in any case, dependable corporate and expert activity, would keep the utilization of these promotions from a social and good standpoint† (Dubihela, 2011, 209). Plainly, a moral issue is available. The Canadian Radio-TV and Telecommunications Commission is one association that has seen liquor notices basically. Since 1968 they have expected supporters to report the quantity of liquor related messages communicated every year (CRTC, 2011). The messages likewise should stick to their Code for Broadcast of Alcoholic Beverages (CRTC, 2011). This code incorporates arrangements to guarantee advancements for mixed refreshments don't empower non-consumers or youngsters to drink or buy liquor, infer a specific brand is predominant in light of a higher liquor rate, and that utilization of liquor improves happiness regarding a movement (CRTC 2011). These guidelines are unmistakably increasingly tolerant contrasted with the limitations on tobacco promoting. Promoting Standards Canada has now picked up duty to survey commercials concerning liquor to guarantee they are as per the CRTC’s code (Darling, 1996). Besides, liquor is similarly as risky to society as tobacco. Measurements Canada shows that liquor use by drivers was a factor in almost 30% of engine vehicle related passings from 2003-2005 (Statistics Canada, 2011). Likewise, passings from other liquor related clutters, for example, cirrhosis of the liver represented more than 1400 passings in 2003 (Statistics Canada, 2009). You read Tobacco Advertising Is Illegal yet Alcohol Is Not in class Exposition models The most pertinent partners in this issue, youngsters, are seriously influenced by liquor use in Canada. In 2011, 13. 2% of Canadian youth ages 12 to 19 fell under the substantial consumer class, that is, expending at least 5 beverages on one event at any rate once every month (Statistics Canada, 2011). Thus, â€Å"the pace of people blamed for disabled driving offenses was most elevated among youthful grown-ups between the ages of 19 and 24† (Statistics Canada, 2011). Also, 28. 8% of Canadian understudies confessed to being driven by somebody who was legitimately debilitated (Statistics Canada, 2011). Numerous Canadians bolster the general assessment that looks to implement stricter guidelines with regards to liquor items. An investigation from the Drug and Alcohol Review Journal reports that 50. 1% of Canadians concur with disallowing liquor promoting (Macdonald et al. , 2011, 653). Also, 47. 4% thought the current legitimate drinking age of nineteen ought to be expanded, and 40. 1% accepted charges on mixed refreshments ought to be raised (Macdonald et al. , 2011, 653). These sorts of changes would make liquor less accessible or alluring to youthful grown-ups. The CRTC’s report that traces the system for their publicizing guidelines states, â€Å"parties contended that inordinate liquor utilization is as hazardous as smoking and, hence, ought to be treated similarly: the customer ought to be cautioned of the threats related with injurious consumption† (Darling, 1996). Obviously, promising the offer of any item that can cause this sort of damage is ethically flippant. Clearly, numerous Canadians accept liquor is a hazardous substance that ought not be effectively available to youngsters. Set up an Interpretive Context This examination is utilized to set up whether a predisposition exists. The demise and malady rate brought about by both liquor and tobacco is inspected to demonstrate that deception is available. Destructive impacts brought about by the utilization of liquor and tobacco is contrasted with reveal why this lopsidedness of publicizing limitation is unreasonable. It is not necessarily the case that tobacco items ought to be reintroduced, however that the two substances ought to be dispensed with from media promoting out and out. Besides, the perspectives on genuine Canadians are considered in light of the fact that this encourages an open circle and structures a boundless supposition on the issue. Likewise considered is the measure of time went through with media by Canadians and explicitly youngsters. Measurements that diagram hours spent sitting in front of the TV and riding the web will be thought of. The best result for this circumstance is to confine liquor notices dependent on similar grounds sketched out in the Tobacco Act. Conversation After auditing the accessible information, it is clear a low inclination exists. The situation of this conversation remains that liquor ought to be disposed of from publicizing for similar reasons tobacco is. Tobacco has been

Simpson S Criminal Case

Chapter by chapter list Evidence Public Exposure The preliminary The decision References A resigned American football player, football telecaster, representative, and entertainer, O. J. Simpson was conceived on the ninth of July 1947. Simpson was held and criminally charged for the homicides of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. It was a long lawful tussle that was held in the Californian prevalent court.Advertising We will compose a custom article test on Simpson ‘S Criminal Case explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More Felman (2002) says that the Los Angeles case had such exposure to gain the portrayal as the instance of Simpson against the individuals. The protracted preliminary anyway observed Simpson absolved. It went on for an entire nine months and was considered the longest preliminary at any point saw in the history books of California’s courts. With all due respect, O. J. Simpson had recruited such a group experienced in legal disputes with such reg arded profile. This regarded prominent group was driven by Robert Shapiro, a proficient and educated individual in issues of the law. Robert Shapiro had taken part in differing cases to gain him the qualification of a prominent figure. Later on, the prominent group was driven by F. Lee Bailey and Jonnie Cochran. A showcase of mind and great mental capacity described F. Jonnie Cochran when he practiced his capacity to persuade members of the jury that the DNA proof illustrated in court was actually not strong proof against Simpson. Aeseng (196) takes note of that Cochran persuaded the jury that the proof was differently deficient. This was combined with the novelty of this sort of logical advancement and revelation in the law courts as a dependable instrument to cite proof. Likewise F. Jonnie Cochran’s contentions weighted to further his potential benefit the blood proof that it had been polluted and had no motivation to be continued as strong proof against Simpson in the homi cide preliminary. This and other proof cited in court were overwhelmingly discredited under the capable administration of Cochran to the barrier of Simpson. The safeguard group contended that the Los Angeles Police Department at differing times and in assorted conditions related with the examinations and treatment of proof plainly engaged with so much unfortunate behavior as to warrant their proof invalid as indicated by (Felman, 2002). Ito (1995) sequentially archives that Simpson wedded Nicole Brown on February 2, 1985 with whom they had two kids, yet later separated in 1992. It was not until second June 1994 that Simpson’s previous spouse, Nicole Brown and her companion Ronald Goldman were discovered dead and Simpson vindicated of any criminal accusations in a dubious legal dispute from there on. Be that as it may, Jury discoveries highlighted Simpson as at risk for the passing of Ronald Goldman. Jury decisions from past preliminaries like the one that finished on third Ju ne 1995 known as â€Å"the preliminary of the century† and ensuing ones absolved OJ Simpson of the two homicides. Shosana (2002) calls attention to that these decisions drew clashes and encounters combined with different emotions along racial lines.Advertising Looking for paper on african american? We should check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More It was not until 1995 that OJ Simpson was articulated not blameworthy of the passings of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman after a progression of cases, for example, the common preliminary for unjust demise on February fifth 1995, with related prosecution on September fifth 2006, and his supposed admissions in his book â€Å"If I Did It† 2007. As indicated by Ito (1995), a progression of occasions prompted the capture of O. J. Simpson. This was the point at which the Los Angeles Police Department had been persuaded that Simpson could turn himself up to the police. Strangely, these charges had no bail. Notwithstanding the charges could putting Simpson in the conceivable danger of homicide, Simpson’s capture was set apart with media inclusion that recommended self destruction. The police were in a quandary. They needed to get him definitely. His opportunity was where attorneys had persuaded them to sit tight for him. It was a situation including the media, the police, and onlookers in their hundreds if not thousands. A pursuit for O. J. Simpson resulted including an expected twenty helicopters and different vehicles. The pursuit was never portrayed by any episode of trades of firearm shoot, however the weapons were held by either party. It reached a conclusion at around eight P.M when a couple of moments later Simpson gave up to the police. Proof According to Linder (2010), implicating proof on the inclusion of OJ Simpson on the homicides vouch for the demonstration. An observer had seen him stroll with his canine and implicating proof of gloves found at the sce ne and outside his house was proof of his contribution. A progression of occasions affirmed and gave proof implicating OJ Simpson of the homicides. On the said date, Simpson’s endeavor to call Paula from his wireless as Charles did, didn't see OJ Simpson on the decisive were not fruitful. As indicated by Linder (2010), OJ Simpson consolidated home savagery with overpowering mercilessness against Nicole Brown, proof of his severity towards her. Notwithstanding witness records of individuals seeing a man of the portrayal of OJ Simpson in the location of homicide on the critical day, his belongings, for example, his white top, his call history affirmed against him. What's more, Simpson deceived Paula on his endeavor to call her from his Bronco, and Allan Park’s calendar to take Simpson to the air terminal on the game changing day fizzled (Linder 2010). Linder keeps on recording the realities that Allan’s attempt to buzz Simpson’s radio got no reaction. On fu rther examinations, Linder (2010) contends that hair was discovered reliable with Simpson’s hair at the homicide scene and on Ron Goldman’s shirt. Other proof that point to him as the guilty party included fiber predictable with that of the rug in the Bronco were found on top at Bundy’s home, blood proof dropped close to shoe prints at Bundy’s when measurably examined demonstrated that about 0.5% of the populace could coordinate that of OJ Simpson’s.Advertising We will compose a custom paper test on Simpson ‘S Criminal Case explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More It was decide later that Simpson had new injury cuts the day after the homicides were perpetrated an away from to a contribution in a demonstration of injury, along these lines highlighting the homicide. Linder (2010) gives a point by point record of gloves that were found at the location of homicide coordinating his, and the condemning proof of shoes and abnormal call s structure Simpson to Paula and Nicole, with prominent anxiety of OJ Simpson when gone up against with inquiries concerning the passing casualties. Linder (2010) shows that Glove proof: Left glove found at Bundy and right glove discovered Simpson habitation are Aris Light gloves, size XL, Nicole Brown purchased pair of Aris Light XL gloves in 1990 at Bloomingdale’s, Simpson wore Aris Light gloves from 1990 to June, 1994. Shoe proof: Shoe prints found at Bundy were from a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, Bloody shoe impact on Bronco cover is steady with a Magli shoe, Simpson wore a size 12 shoe. Additional proof implying OJ Simpson as the culprit of the wrongdoing was the point at which he wouldn't affirm in his legal dispute. Linder (2010) says that â€Å"Simpson didn't affirm at his criminal preliminary. Barrier lawyers will quite often call as an observer a lucid customer that they accept to be innocent†. Different preliminaries demonstrated that Simpson had no critical ex ertion in finding the executioners as Shosana (2002) shows. Furthermore, â€Å"Subsequent to the criminal preliminary other proof of Simpson’s blame surfaced.â The most critical of the new proof may have been photos of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes.â The new proof, along with a great part of the proof considered in the criminal preliminary, persuaded a common jury that Simpson killed Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman† Linder (2010). What's more, Simpson admitted in his book â€Å"If I Did It† written in 2007. Cited DNA proof appeared to firmly affirm against Simpson. Moderately new in figuring out who and what in tests, blood found at the scene had DNA that certainly highlighted Simpson as the prime suspect. Aeseng (1996) depicts the blood tests as affirmed to be his after DNA tests were led to recognize whose example the blood could be. Tests are tried and a walk led to decide the level of dependability on the tests. They walked well and left little uncer tainty with respect to whom the blood found at the homicide scene had a place. Ito (1995) sees the blood tests found at various focuses obviously comparable that of Simpson. These blood tests were found in close Simpson’s Bronco, on a couple of sock having a place with Simpson that found on Goldman’s shirt additionally firmly highlighted Simpson as the offender, blood gathered by LAPD criminologist following a little while highlighted him, and fingerprints that were blood recolored likewise showed that Simpson was included. Anyway the blood proof was not without traps. Aeseng (1996) remarks that, among the deficiencies remembered unexplained conditions for which a blood test had disappeared from LA County District Attorney’s office. The assortment methods for some blood tests from the location of the wrongdoing appeared to be imperfect and firmly proposed sullying. Other proof introduced in court was disproved as not solid. The contentions were that sure shoes i ntroduced didn't coordinate Simpson’s and that he had always lost such shoes. They were not his.Advertising Searching for paper on african american? We should check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Find out More Open Exposure Though the case pulled in boundless media and open

Dragons

Dragons Nowadays we seem to primarily battle problem sets and thesis snakes, but once upon a time humans did battle with dragons. Right now I’m battling a 5.60  (thermodynamics) p-set. The  deceptively fluffy roadslush precursor  snow from my Gmail background is falling outside my window. I got sick right when I got back to Boston after IAP, so up until a few days ago my personal dragon has been pathetic and droopy and largely sedentary and cold. My last dragon at MIT was my finals dragon, about two months ago. Because I’m a senior all but one of my finals were final projects. My only exam was in 6.034 (artificial intelligence). Most finals dragons, especially freshman or sophomore year, look more like ginormous hydrae with flamethrowers. The stick figure warrior is my friend David K. ‘16. He brought a giant teddy bear friend to all of his finals. If you would like to spread happiness with your every step and dramatically improve the lives of all the people you encounter, bring a giant stuffed animal to your exams.  Everyone’s week was way better than it would have been otherwise. This is the way I would like to live my life, finals and otherwise. I would be much happier, I think, if I brought a giant teddy bear (or turtle or octopus or cow) to my battles. I think I would fight my battles better if I took them less seriously. In particular, I wish I’d had that attitude against the dragon that most of you are facing right now, the dragon that felt like the final boss of my childhood. There are so many other things I remember from high school. Trying to find a parking spot in Spain. Ice skating with my mom. Skiing in the forest past dark with my family. Learning how to drive with my dad on a two-lane highway, stick shift, farms on either side of us. Eating lunch during chemistry lecture. Staying up late listening to Taylor Swift and burning strawberries into our guitar the night before states. Dreaming about nationals. Crying on the bus home when we didn’t make it. Holding hands on the way to class. Falling in and out of love, again and again and again. I don’t know why I thought, when I had so many wonderful universes around and within me, that college admissions were more important than all the other experiences I was living.  I love MIT, but but there was no good reason for me to want to be anywhere but exactly when and where I already was. When I got deferred, I stayed up all night alone and ate an entire box of clementines. I don’t think I did anything unusual between December and March or even between when I got in and when I left for MIT. I wish I had. If I were youâ€"which is to say, if I could go back in time to four years agoâ€"I would try to make those months more special. I have memories of my family going hiking or skiing and me staying home to work. I wouldn’t do that. If I could do things over I would work less, kayak more, photograph more sunrises, and try to really get to know the people I loved before all of us changed and split apart. College applications are tiny in comparison to the dragons you’ve already conquered over the past two decades. At least for me, high school was like the college applications dragon and his dad innocently visiting a Christmas tree farm. And you’ve practically already conquered that one. No one, not even MIT, can take away the accomplishments you did or did not list on your college applications or how awesome you are for getting to where you are now. MIT is a pretty cool sword, but it’s not Excalibur. You won’t blind your opponents and you’ll still bleed. I have a feeling that the scariest dragons that you and I will face in our lives won’t be dragons that a college degree could help with, and I am confident that our biggest triumphs or losses will not be an admissions decision. Inhale. Exhale. Bring your teddy bear. You are wonderful. You will be okay. Here are some experiences and advice from other people who were deferred or waitlisted. Lisa Z. ‘17 The day after I got deferred, my friend took me to the mall to cheer me up, and I remember singing “Forget You” in the car with her, joking about MIT. It was difficult, because several people in my school applied early action, and two of them were accepted. The rest, like me and one of my good friends, were deferred. When I saw how many people were deferred, I figured it was MIT’s way of politely denying applicants. I spent the time before final decisions came out absorbed in the application process for other schools, religiously editing essays and looking up acceptance statistics. In the RA round, I wasn’t really sure what to write about, so I just gave a paragraph being completely honest about what I’d been doing since I sent my application in, and how I felt about each activity. For example, I was musical director the previous year for my school’s musical, and I wrote about how I was doing that again my senior year. Then I just gave a funny quote referring to how long waiting for decisions feels. Because I was fairly sure I wasn’t going to get accepted, I stopped being super formal in my update form and showed more personality, which actually might have helped. When decisions came out, some of those people in my school were rejected, but they all attend great schools now (Princeton, Yale, Georgetown, etc.). However, some of us, like me and my good friend, were accepted. A deferral definitely does not mean rejection. I’ve met so many people here at MIT who were originally deferred. I know that waiting for decisions sucks, but if you keep busy the time will go by much faster. And no matter what, you’ll end up with some amazing choices for where to attend school for the next four years. Harriet L. ‘13 I think the first thing I ever received from MIT was my deferral notification, which, though mildly traumatic (‘This must mean I won’t get accepted anywhere’), was not surprising, and actually kind of nice, once I realized they hadn’t actually rejected me yet, which they would have done if they were sure I wouldn’t fit in or survive. My application was nothing special. My essay described daydreaming during my extracurricular activities, which seemed to suggest that I was applying to an art program rather than an institute of technology; the only STEM related activity I’d ever done was join the Math Team because they had pretty little puzzles. But I had been honest on my application, told them the truth, as well as I knew it, about myself and my interests; I could expect no more from myself. I gave no updates, for nothing had significantly changed in a few months, and put the application out of my mind and trusted MIT to make a good decision (though actually, I’d been al most continuously sick for three months due to applications-related anxiety, and I just didn’t want to be sick anymore, and there was no way I was going to let some abstract entity I’d never seen before ruin my last chances to do interpretive dances in math class). Anonymous I don’t think my deferral experience would be too helpful to others; I was battling personal issues so I did not think about the deferral too much, although I felt pretty deep disappointment when I found out. But I will give a data point: of the five to ten deferred applicants from my school, I was the only one to get in. There were two EA admits, and I don’t remember any EA rejections. Ceres L. ‘14 I actually applied to MIT during regular admission and was waitlisted. Obviously, I was later admitted, much to my surprise. I’m now a senior studying Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. To be completely frank, I did not expect to get into MIT. Around my junior year of high school, when I was starting to seriously consider college, MIT was on my list of “well, it’d be cool but it’ll never happen” colleges. So, when I was waitlisted, I was actually really happy. I took it as some acknowledgement that I was pretty good, and the very fact that MIT told me that they wanted me but did not have enough room at the time was one of the best compliments I had gotten. Of course, I was just expecting to be rejected later, so I didn’t think about it much. Long story short, I was admitted in early May. But for you guys who are now waiting for the RA round, I’d like to share a bit about my mindset and what I did between regular decisions and waitlist decisions. I sent one update to MIT. I sent them a letter telling them about what I had done in the past few months. And now, I can’t even remember what was on it. The letter was just a general status update, telling them about how high school was going, how I was playing in the band for the school play, and how I would love to attend MIT. I didn’t beat myself up that I hadn’t gotten in RA. I had absolutely no expectations about how the waitlisting round would go. I really guess all I can say to the potential class of 2018 now, is that for those of you who think being deferred is a kick in the face telling you that you’re not good enough, don’t think that way. There are more people than MIT has room for. There are other colleges that are also really good colleges. MIT is one potential future for some of you, and for the rest, there are others that you may not have even considered yet. Don’t think that your achievements aren’t good enough, or that the things you put on your applications are silly, childish, or whatever other negative things you are thinking about it. In one of my essays to MIT, I compared myself to a sandwich. I was really hungry at the time and wanted a sandwich, so I wrote about it. Do not try to change yourself or paint yourself in a light that you think that MIT would like, because that’s not really you. As cruel as this sounds, some of you will not be a good fit for MIT, and if you are able to get in from craftin g “the perfect application,” you’ll probably end up going to a university that wouldn’t benefit you as much as somewhere else. You don’t have to just fixate on MIT; there are plenty of opportunities out there. Oh, one last thing. People who get in during early action aren’t necessarily way better than the rest. You will not be treated differently for not getting in during the early action round, nor is the time at which you were admitted any indication of how successful you will be in the future. Do not fixate only on how you think others will perceive you. In this world, there are always people you need to impress, but the one that is often forgotten and hardest to impress is yourself. James H. ‘16 When I was deferred, I realized that I had to buckle down, put my nose to the grindstone, saddle up, and whatever other sayings you can think of. It was then that I decided to join the Evil League of Evil to rain down destruction upon humanity. My freeze ray and I would stop the world, and MIT’s tears would dry when I handed it the keys to a shiny new Australia (a far better place to dump our radioactive waste than Harvard). In all seriousness, upon receiving the letter I watched Doctor Horrible and lazed about. The deferring you received is an invitation to finally finish that freeze ray, pretend to be a statue, and take down Captain Hammer once and for all. To use the words of the thoroughbred of sin himself: There will be blood, it might be yours. So go kill someone. Signed, Bad Horse. But don’t actually kill anyone. Obviously. If you would like some more encouragement and distractions, I wrote you two more blog posts. I wrote them in the past, so you will have to travel: As We Approach Decision Day Admissions Decisions and Mystery Hunt